Cart (0)
  • No items in cart.
Total
$0
There is a technical issue about last added item. You can click "Report to us" button to let us know and we resolve the issue and return back to you or you can continue without last item via click to continue button.
Filters:
FORMAT
EDITION
to
PUBLISHER
(1)
(338)
(589)
(599)
(55)
(234)
(996)
(690)
(2161)
(117)
(94958)
(58)
(575)
(124)
(33)
(21)
(20)
(95391)
(3)
(17)
(1)
(374)
(319)
(6732)
(241)
(16)
(6)
(1667)
(17)
(19)
(28)
(4)
 
(6)
(7)
(115)
(3)
(57)
(5)
(5)
(1)
(1)
(2)
(25)
(27)
(27)
(13)
(61)
(24)
(22)
(7)
(8)
(20)
(1)
(3)
(50)
(6)
(33)
CONTENT TYPE
 Act
 Admin Code
 Announcements
 Bill
 Book
 CADD File
 CAN
 CEU
 Charter
 Checklist
 City Code
 Code
 Commentary
 Comprehensive Plan
 Conference Paper
 County Code
 Course
 DHS Documents
 Document
 Errata
 Executive Regulation
 Federal Guideline
 Firm Content
 Guideline
 Handbook
 Interpretation
 Journal
 Land Use and Development
 Law
 Legislative Rule
 Local Amendment
 Local Code
 Local Document
 Local Regulation
 Local Standards
 Manual
 Model Code
 Model Standard
 Notice
 Ordinance
 Other
 Paperback
 PASS
 Periodicals
 PIN
 Plan
 Policy
 Product
 Product - Data Sheet
 Program
 Provisions
 Requirements
 Revisions
 Rules & Regulations
 Standards
 State Amendment
 State Code
 State Manual
 State Plan
 State Standards
 Statute
 Study Guide
 Supplement
 Sustainability
 Technical Bulletin
 All
  • ASTM
    F3178-24 Standard Practice for Operational Risk Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) (Redline)
    Edition: 2024
    $113.57
    Unlimited Users per year

Description of ASTM-F3178 2024

ASTM F3178-24

Redline Standard: Standard Practice for Operational Risk Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)




ASTM F3178

Scope

1.1 This practice focuses on preparing operational risk assessments (ORAs) to be used for supporting unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) design, airworthiness, and subsequent applications to the CAA for approval of low altitude operations (for example, below 400 ft AGL).

1.2 In mitigating and preventing incidents and accidents, it is understood that people generally do not seek to cause damage or injure others, and therefore, malicious acts are beyond the scope of this practice.

1.3 As part of the ORA, the applicant should clearly understand and be able to articulate their intended mission for purposes of assessing safety and providing information to the CAA. This documentation of a UAS operation (mission, or set of missions) is what many refer to as a concept of operations (CONOPS).2

1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.


Keywords

air risk; ground risk; hazard analysis; operational risk assessment; ORA; risk analysis; safety risk management;


ICS Code

ICS Number Code 49.020 (Aircraft and space vehicles in general)


DOI: 10.1520/F3178-24

GROUPS