FORMAT
EDITION
PUBLISHER
CONTENT TYPE
Act
Admin Code
Announcements
Bill
Book
CADD File
CAN
CEU
Charter
Checklist
City Code
Code
Commentary
Comprehensive Plan
Conference Paper
County Code
Course
DHS Documents
Document
Errata
Executive Regulation
Federal Guideline
Firm Content
Guideline
Handbook
Interpretation
Journal
Land Use and Development
Law
Legislative Rule
Local Amendment
Local Code
Local Document
Local Regulation
Local Standards
Manual
Model Code
Model Standard
Notice
Ordinance
Other
Paperback
PASS
Periodicals
PIN
Plan
Policy
Product
Product - Data Sheet
Program
Provisions
Requirements
Revisions
Rules & Regulations
Standards
State Amendment
State Code
State Manual
State Plan
State Standards
Statute
Study Guide
Supplement
Sustainability
Technical Bulletin
All
|
Description of ASTM-E2263 2012ASTM E2263 - 12Standard Test Method for Paired Preference TestActive Standard ASTM E2263 | Developed by Subcommittee: E18.04 Book of Standards Volume: 15.08 ASTM E2263Significance and Use 5.1 The paired preference test determines whether or not there is a preference for one product over another product among a specific target population. Knowledge of consumer segments, brand loyalties, the range of product offerings in the marketplace, and the decision risk must be understood when planning a paired preference test. 5.2 The paired preference method is commonly used in tests with one or more of the following objectives: ( 1 ) to establish superiority in preference versus the competition for advertising claims support; ( 2 ) to establish the preference of a new product for launch versus a competitor's product; ( 3 ) to establish the preference of a reformulated product in a product improvement or product modification project (for example, process change or ingredient change); and ( 4 ) to establish the preference of a cost improved product versus the current formulation in a cost savings project. Selected values of P max , ?, and ? will change with all four types of test objectives. These should be selected prior to determination of N . 5.2.1 Preference versus Competition or Launching a New Product versus Competition Select a P max to represent what you expect a reasonable preference split to be. The main risk to avoid is to wrongly claim your product is preferred over the competitors. Thus, low values of ? are selected, for example, 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001. The desired outcome of this test is to reject the null hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis is one sided: A new or improved product (A) is preferred over the competitors product (B). The test is one-sided. The value of ? will be determined by the sample size chosen and the size of the preference in the consumer segment selected for the test. Selection of the appropriate number of respondents is determined by P max , ?, and ?, as well as the market segment that must be included in the test (for issues specific to conducting a paired preference test for an advertising claim, refer to Guide E1958 ). 5.2.2 Cost Reduction or Reformulation of an Existing Product When parity preference is the desired test outcome, values of ? are increased and values of ? are decreased. For example, if a product is developed which represents a significant cost savings over the current formulation and there is concern over alienation of current users, ? might be selected at 0.20 and ? might be selected at 0.01. Parity testing can be either one-or two-sided depending on the action standards of the test. The test is one-sided if the action standard is that the product must be parity or better. The test is two-sided if the action standard is parity only. The number of respondents chosen must reflect the risk of replacing the current product with the cost-reduced product. 5.3 A test result of superiority or parity does not ensure that the test conclusion is correct. An incorrect test result can be obtained when the sample of respondents is selected in a way that does not reflect the true preference in the population of interest, or when the number of respondents is too small to correctly reflect the preference status of the two products among the target consumer group. Careful selection of P max , ?, and ? and an appropriate selection of respondents is needed to minimize the risk of drawing an incorrect conclusion in forced-choice paired preference testing. 1. Scope 1.1 This document covers a procedure for determining preference between two products using either a two-alternative forced-choice task, or with the option of choosing no preference. Preference testing is a type of hedonic testing. 1.2 A paired preference test determines whether there is a statistically significant preference between two products for a given population of respondents. The target population must be carefully considered. 1.3 This method establishes preference in a single evaluation context. Replicated tests will not be covered within the scope of this document. 1.4 Paired preference testing can address overall preference or preference for a specified sensory attribute. 1.5 The method does not directly determine the magnitude of preference. 1.6 This method does not address whether or not two samples are perceived as different. Refer to Test Method E2164 for directional difference test. 1.7 A paired preference test is a simple task for respondents, and can be used with populations that have minimal reading or comprehension skills, or both. 1.8 Preference is not an intrinsic attribute of the product, such as hue is, but is a subjective measure relating to respondents' affective or hedonic response. It differs from paired comparison testing which measures objective characteristics of the product. Preference results are always dependent on the population sampled. 1.9 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety problems associated with its use, when testing includes hazardous materials, operations, or equipment. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and to determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
ISO Standard ISO5495 Sensory Analysis--Methodology--Paired Comparison Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St., 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036.ASTM Standards E253 Terminology Relating to Sensory Evaluation of Materials and Products E456 Terminology Relating to Quality and Statistics E1858 Test Method for Determining Oxidation Induction Time of Hydrocarbons by Differential Scanning Calorimetry E1871 Guide for Serving Protocol for Sensory Evaluation of Foods and Beverages E2164 Test Method for Directional Difference Test Keywords paired preference; preference; sensory; test method; ICS Code ICS Number Code 03.100.10 (Purchasing. Procurement. Logistics) DOI: 10.1520/E2263-12 ASTM International is a member of CrossRef. ASTM E2263The following editions for this book are also available...This book also exists in the following packages...Subscription InformationMADCAD.com ASTM Standards subscriptions are annual and access is unlimited concurrency based (number of people that can access the subscription at any given time) from single office location. For pricing on multiple office location ASTM Standards Subscriptions, please contact us at info@madcad.com or +1 800.798.9296.
Some features of MADCAD.com ASTM Standards Subscriptions are: - Immediate Access: As soon as the transaction is completed, your ASTM Standards Subscription will be ready for access.
For any further information on MADCAD.com ASTM Standards Subscriptions, please contact us at info@madcad.com or +1 800.798.9296.
About ASTMASTM International, formerly known as the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), is a globally recognized leader in the development and delivery of international voluntary consensus standards. Today, some 12,000 ASTM standards are used around the world to improve product quality, enhance safety, facilitate market access and trade, and build consumer confidence. ASTM’s leadership in international standards development is driven by the contributions of its members: more than 30,000 of the world’s top technical experts and business professionals representing 150 countries. Working in an open and transparent process and using ASTM’s advanced electronic infrastructure, ASTM members deliver the test methods, specifications, guides, and practices that support industries and governments worldwide. |
GROUPS
|